Arraign AI logoBack

Civil practice suite

Seven civil studios, all built on arithmetic you can check by hand.

A criminal case rarely stays in the criminal division. Each studio below works from the statute or rule it names, counts weekends and holidays explicitly, and refuses to state a deadline it cannot verify for the selected state. Everything on this page is computed in your browser from a fictional sample file.

Sign in to open a matterSee all capabilities

Family law & injunction reconciliation

Reconciles a criminal no-contact condition against timesharing and support orders, and drafts the emergency motion to carve out third-party exchanges.

Sample file: Criminal no-contact condition entered after an existing timesharing order.

Conflicts found

2

Blocking conflicts

1

UCCJEA home state

Florida is the home state: the child has lived there for 14 consecutive months immediately before commencement, which satisfies the six-month UCCJEA test.

Flagged before anything exports

  • No-contact condition contains no family-court carve-out — As written the condition reaches every contact, which makes court-ordered timesharing impossible to perform without exposing the client to a violation. A carve-out for exchanges directed by the family-court order is the narrow fix.
  • Criminal condition post-dates the family order — The no-contact condition was entered 394 day(s) after the timesharing order. The criminal court can modify its own condition without disturbing the family judgment.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT
IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

SAMPLE PARENT,
        Movant,
v.
CO-PARENT,
        Respondent.
CASE NO.: 2026-DR-000774-O

EMERGENCY MOTION TO MODIFY NO-CONTACT CONDITION TO PERMIT COURT-ORDERED TIMESHARING

1. Sample Parent moves the Court to modify the no-contact condition entered in case number 2026-MM-001904-A on December 6, 1969 so that it does not prohibit compliance with the timesharing order entered November 7, 1968.

2. The family court order provides: Alternating weekends and Wednesday overnights, exchanges at the parents' residences.

3. The criminal condition provides: No contact of any kind, direct or indirect, with the protected party.

4. The two directives cannot both be obeyed. The child or children affected are A.R. (age 9), J.R. (age 6).

5. Custody determinations in this state are governed by Fla. Stat. § 61.13(3), and the protective condition at issue is governed by Fla. Stat. § 741.30. Neither authority contemplates that a defendant must violate one court's order to obey another's.

6. Jurisdiction over the child custody determination rests in Florida under Fla. Stat. § 61.514. Florida is the home state: the child has lived there for 14 consecutive months immediately before commencement, which satisfies the six-month UCCJEA test.

RELIEF REQUESTED

7. Permit all exchanges of the child or children to occur through Maternal grandmother, agreed by both parents, with no direct contact between the parties.

8. Permit written electronic communication strictly limited to the logistics of exchanges and the children's medical, school and safety needs.

9. Direct that this modification does not otherwise disturb the protective condition, which remains in full force as to every other form of contact.

The movant requests an expedited hearing before the next scheduled exchange.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on [DATE] a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served on all parties
of record by the method prescribed by the applicable rules of procedure.

____________________________________
Counsel

Draft work product for a licensed attorney to review, edit and sign. Nothing here is legal advice, and no document leaves the studio until counsel records a review.